The following article confirms what has
been speculated on for years. How can a part of your anatomy that has been
trussed and supported artificially be expected to do anything other than lose
the ability to tone and be self-supportive.
The other concern not mentioned in the following article, but that also make a lot of common sense, is what does the wearing of a tight undergarment around the chest do to the lymphatic system? Can there be a build-up of toxins in the breast tissue that the natural unimpeded movement of breasts would otherwise drain? Does this impact breast health?
Ladies do not be a slave to fashion and convention say NO to chest binding the same way that you would say NO to foot binding which deforms the feet.
The other concern not mentioned in the following article, but that also make a lot of common sense, is what does the wearing of a tight undergarment around the chest do to the lymphatic system? Can there be a build-up of toxins in the breast tissue that the natural unimpeded movement of breasts would otherwise drain? Does this impact breast health?
Ladies do not be a slave to fashion and convention say NO to chest binding the same way that you would say NO to foot binding which deforms the feet.
WOMEN - you've been lied to for years. That bra you're wearing? It's making your boobs saggier.
A French study spanning 15-years has found that not only do bras make your breasts sag even more, they do nothing to reduce back pain.
"Medically, physiologically, anatomically - breasts gain no benefit from being denied gravity," said Jean-Denis Rouillon, Research Professor on the French study, told Counsel and Heal.
"On the contrary, they get saggier with a bra."
The study looked at 330 women and the changes in their breasts over time using a slide rule and caliper, and concluded that breasts naturally become more toned and supported if no bra is used. When a bra is used, the breast becomes dependent on the artificial support, making them degrade more quickly.
Additionally, the study found that going braless gives women a 7mm lift in their nipples for every year they go without, and aids in fading stretch marks.
Capucine, a 28-year-old participant in Rouillon's study, told France Info that since being involved in the study she hasn't worn a bra for two years.
"There are multiple benefits: I breathe more easily, I carry myself better, and I have less back pain," she said.
So should we all be banning the bra?
"While we validated the hypothesis that the bra is a false 'need'...it would be dangerous to advise all women to stop wearing their soutien-gorge as the women involved were not a representative sample of the population," Rouillon said.
An interesting and revealing response to the new research on bras causing breast sagging is that the researcher was criticized by some media outlets as somehow sexually perverse for studying women's breast shape. As soon as the subject of breasts is brought up, adolescent humor and sexual innuendo begin. Society is so conditioned to thinking of breasts as only sexual objects that studying the impact of bras on breast health is considered sexually provocative by our breast-obsessed, immature culture. This is a big reason why so little research has been done on the harm caused by bras, including the major link between breast cancer and bras.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with your comment.
ReplyDeleteAs I have said elsewhere in this blog we need to reclaim our bodies from the commercial interests that have hijacked them by playing up the sexual aspects of the body in order to get attention and sell products or pornographic images. I believe that this exploitation fuels the adolescent attitudes that abound in our society.
Thanks for your comment.